Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Digital Leica M
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 21:22:36 -0600
References: <000901c370f1$1d006420$121afea9@Hausner>

Buzz,

This is the Lug. You'll find more facts on the "UFO's are Real User 
Group" than here most days.

Regards,

Greg

Buzz Hausner wrote:

>Don, I humbly request that you cite some actual figures to sustain the
>statements you make below.  Otherwise, I for one would appreciate
>efforts to keep the unsubstantiated assumptions and hyperbole to a
>minimum.
>
>	Buzz Hausner
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Don Dory
>Sent: Monday, September 01, 2003 8:19 PM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: RE: [Leica] Digital Leica M
>
>B.D.
>As in the past, amateurs or professional wannabees buy the vast majority
>of pro stuff.  Example one would be the number of Nikon F's that have
>come out of the closet.  Example two, to come on topic, how many
>Noctilux's have been purchased by amateurs?  Example three would be the
>number of Hasselblads that the professional class bought to take
>snapshots with.
>
>0.02
>
>Don
>dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>  
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Buzz Hausner" <buzz.hausner@verizon.net> (RE: [Leica] Digital Leica M)