Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Good point! I opted out for a 90-C for it's weight, never mind very low cost, and that it's an outdoor lens for the most part. I use it as part of a small light kit along with a CV28 F3.5 and a 35 'cron. Although, I wouldn't mind seeing the 2.8 reworked for size and weight. With an Asp. surface they just might be able to produce another legend. Slobodan Dimitrov - ---------- >From: Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: Re: [Leica] god help me...but God isn't available right now, Jack >Date: Wed, Aug 20, 2003, 9:59 PM > > While I have not seen the Elmar C it's hard to believe it is larger than > the latest version of the Elmarit. > > In fact this discussion had me wondering why Leica doesn't update the Elmar > C and bring it out as a compact adjunct to the Tri-Elmar > > Dennis - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html