Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> I decided on the 10D instead of the 1Ds because of the size. That 1Ds is a > monster of a camera. Compare these sizes: > Canon 1Ds 55.9 ounces, 6.1 x 6.2 x 3.2 > Canon 10D 30.9 ounces, 5.9 x 4.2 x 3 > Leica R9 28 ounces, 6.25 x 4 x 2.5 I've never handled one, but it seems like the 10D _is_ a sturdy camera ... I mean it's heavier than an R9 and I would think it's not only dead weight. (Heavy enough to sink in a muddy river ...) 10D must be a professional camera ... we all know someone who uses one. Daniel - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html