Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: Re: No digital comments?
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 07:41:54 +0200 (MEST)
References: <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBMEHGCIAA.phong@doan-ltd.com>

He's just glad this didn't crop up when he was on vacation :)

On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Phong wrote:

> > Brian hasn't said a thing.
>
> Doesn't mean he approves or disapproves.
> If there is a God, I'd like him to be like Brian.
> Create the world, then leave it alone.  Once in a
> while, make an appearance so that people, especially
> some clergy folks, know that there is a God. :-)
>
> All kidding aside, the success of the LUG lies not
> in Leica, but in Brian's non-intervention
> which lets a hundred flowers bloom, to
> borrow a recent Chinese Communist phrase.
> There are other Leica lists, and I find them stale.
>
> It's Leica that brought us to the LUG, but
> it's our other interests that bring us together.
>
> - Phong
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of bdcolen
> > Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 4:36 PM
> > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> > Subject: RE: [Leica] RE: Re: No digital comments?
> >
> >
> > David - I use and enjoy Leica Ms; three M6s, two Abrahamson winders,
> > four Leica lenses and one Cosina lens. They are part of my photo tool
> > kit.
> >
> > But I own them not because they are Leicas, but because they are the
> > best rangefinder cameras I could find, and they fit my shooting style.
> > My interest in photography is an interest in - photography. I want to
> > create outstanding images, and hope that once and a while I succeed. I
> > want to share my images with people with an interest in - photography. I
> > want to look at outstanding images, and care not with what they are
> > shot, because I know enough about photography to understand what counts
> > is the image, no the camera used to capture it. I also know enough about
> > photography to know that I can improve my own images by studying the
> > images of others, no matter what they were shot with.
> >
> > I chose to belong to this list because I share with people on this list
> > the use of Leica cameras, and because I have a number of friends here. I
> > am here because this is an interesting community.
> >
> > Frankly, if this becomes a Leica-only list - and it has not been such in
> > the - what? four? - years I have been a member - I will have little
> > interest in remaining. Because, frankly, if it becomes a Leicaverted
> > list many of the best photographers, and many of the most interesting
> > people, will be gone.
> >
> > So before you push to hard for brand cleansing here, consider that,
> > given her post today, you will be pushing the likes of Tina Manley out
> > the door.
> >
> > And by the way, while I am certainly aware of Brian's rules for the
> > list, I note that most of this hankering to discuss and show nothing but
> > Leica images comes from those who are Leica-come-latelies to the list -
> > and Brian hasn't said a thing.
> >
> > B. D.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> (RE: [Leica] RE: Re: No digital comments?)
In reply to: Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] RE: Re: No digital comments?)