Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/13
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]In a message dated 8/13/03 9:41:41 PM Pacific Daylight Time, sonc@sonc.com writes: > This is, indeed, the Leica list, as you pointed out, and the 5050 is no > Leica. Sonny, Who knows? Maybe it is. I'm ambivalent about the 5050 and its confreres because I'm ambivalent about digital in general at this point in its development. I'm not ambivalent about the Leica M or R. I'll send you a few 5050 shots offlist from time to time. I don't know what they'll prove. The only way someone can convince me that the Digilux or its double, the LC-5, is any different from the 5050 is to send me one of those cameras as a loner for me to use for a couple of weeks. I certainly won't buy one of them to prove that the 5050 isn't their equal. Why pay twice for the same camera? br - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html