Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I used to play the "catch the bill" game a lot as a kid. If the catcher was allowed to touch the releasing hand say with his pinky, it increased his odds tremendously, thus confirming that the ocular path is slower than a true reflex. Hey, that's a very graphic way to illustrate the concept if you teach neurology or biology. - - Phong caliguri@rcn.com wrote: > > Hi Folks! > > Reaction time and stimuli are, scientifically, paired in an extremely > interesting way. Reflexive reactions, such as the 'hammer on knee' > check you might receive in a medical check. The 'flexor reaction' of your > leg when you step on something that hurts, is VERY fast -- in some > less than 10 milliseconds (the signal does not have to travel to the > higher areas of the central nervous system. They just need to pass > through the spinal cord and a couple of synapses). Yes - you are > eventually aware of it, but it will happen with your eyes closed and ears > not hearing a thing! Others, such as the trick of having a person hold > their thumb and index finger 6 or so cm. apart, while you hold the bill > vertically with the bottom edge between them. Ask them to catch it with > their two fingers when you drop it and they can keep it. MOST of the > time, they cannot (so watch the amount!) because that action is not > reflexive, they it's the "ocular" path so to speak, that one of you had > mentioned. There is a lot of processing that needs to take place from > when the 'catcher' sees it fall and pinches her fingers. Wild animals are > blessed with some actions that are reflexive for them, but most people, > that help them evade predators or get dinner etc.... that sometimes > makes photographing them, birds especially, very difficult. It also > depends on the size and type of the neurons, type of muscle and > junction, use of smell, etc....However, I suppose the point I am after is > this -- most neuroscientists would agree that we can all be 'wired' > differently, with multi pathways that provide the same end. Maybe some > of the better 'peak action' photographers can be so in tune with their > subject, camera, environment that their photography becomes more > reflexive than contrived. Their camera, it's lag time, the sound and feel > of it, becomes part of the whole. Perfect blend of human and machine > working in harmony, such as great sports superstars or people who > just 'know' what to do under certain circumstances. There are many > possibilities! Really very interesting to think on! > Ed - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html