Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time(aural or visual stimuli)
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Sat, 9 Aug 2003 11:48:10 +0200
References: <861E7358-C9EC-11D7-8195-000393802534@mac.com>

The reaction time is also dependant of the type of stimulus.
The aural reaction time is way faster then the ocular one.
This is partly caused by the lenght of the nerves and he distance signals
have to travel on them.
best regards
simon jessurun
> LRZeitlin@aol.com wrote:
>
> > My old experimental psychology textbooks give the simple reaction time
> > of most people as about 200 milliseconds.
>
> This is largely irrelevant.  The way such experiments are conducted is
> by having someone wait for a stimulus, then respond when they detect it
> as quickly as they can.
>
> In the real world, and certainly for most things that photographers
> point a camera towards, rhythm and timing is much more of a factor than
> reaction time.  Photographs catch the height of action by
> *anticipating* the rhythm of something and by *timing* their exposure
> to coincide with the photographically optimal moment.  Read Ted's
> comment on horse jumping, for example.
>
> I don't know of any experiments, but I'm quite sure that top drummers
> are capable of keeping time much closer than 200 ms to the
> theoretically perfect beat -- which is not explained by such
> psychological experimental results because these ignore context.  As so
> much laboratory-based psychological experimentation does.
>
> By the same token, your proposed experiment has very little to do with
> real world photography.  A better example would be someone who is
> bouncing a basket ball in a steady rhythm.  I'm willing to bet that
> with a little experience and knowing your camera gear (i.e., getting a
> feel for the shutter lag, thus being able to anticipate the release
> moment), most people would be able to catch the ball compressed on the
> ground in a pretty good number of shots on a 36 exposure roll.
>
> M.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Martin Howard <mvhoward@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] Photographic reaction time)