Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Turing test
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2003 21:15:43 +0200 (MEST)
References: <000101c35ddc$c4675340$3e23fea9@ccasony01>

Oh boy, now we are getting philosophical :)

In order to represent something, you have to reproduce its essence. (TGIF)

Daniel


On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, bdcolen wrote:

> A photo can be  a faithful REPRESENTATION of something without being a
> faithful REPRODUCTION of something. ;-)
>
> B. D.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
> LRZeitlin@aol.com
> Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:31 PM
> To: leica-users-digest@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] Turing test
>
>
> Eric writes:
>
> <<What's all this nonsense and turing tests that mean nothing? Any idiot
>
>
> can tell the difference between a photo of a window and the window.
>
>
> And I know cats that DO react to the TV.>>
>
> Eric,
>
> That's just the point. If the photo were truly a faithful representation
> of
> reality, you should not be able to tell the difference. "Truth" has
> nothing to
> do with photographic fidelity.
>
> Your cats are smarter than mine.
>
> Larry Z
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Turing test)