RE: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.

["Clive Moss" <chmphoto@sbcglobal.net>]

The tendency of lists to bifurcate and specialize is an annoyance. We could
end up with an M-Titanium list, a black-enamel-M list, a chrome-M list, not
to mention specialization by whatever your preferred viewfinder
magnification is. If this list really concentrated on "what M Leicas do
best" and stayed on topic, traffic would drop to almost zero, and most of
that boring. Check the archives. The best list for "what M Leicas do best"
is John Brownlow's Street Photography list -- and they rarely talk about the
cameras over there.
- -- 
Clive
http://clive.moss.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of 
> Afterswift@aol.com
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 11:46 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digital vs. film.
> 
> 
> 
> In a message dated 8/5/03 8:38:11 AM, sonc@sonc.com writes:
> 
> << How  on earth could you come to the conclusion that the 
> LUG is essentially
> 
> an M list?
> 
> 
> SonC >>
> 
> Like you, I'm beginning to have my doubts. Maybe we should 
> suggest a sister 
> list: the Leica Digilux Etc. list.
> Then the digi folks could take their business to the proper 
> storefront and 
> leave us M people in blissful convocation and dedication to 
> what M Leicas do 
> best. 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html