Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.
From: "Ted Bayer" <tedbayer@charter.net>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 10:46:34 -0700
References: <1a2.187e2207.2c61395a@aol.com>

I will vote "Yes" for that.

Ted


Ted
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Afterswift@aol.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.


>
> In a message dated 8/5/03 8:38:11 AM, sonc@sonc.com writes:
>
> << How  on earth could you come to the conclusion that the LUG is
essentially
>
> an M list?
>
>
> SonC >>
>
> Like you, I'm beginning to have my doubts. Maybe we should suggest a
sister
> list: the Leica Digilux Etc. list.
> Then the digi folks could take their business to the proper storefront and
> leave us M people in blissful convocation and dedication to what M Leicas
do
> best.
>
> br
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Afterswift@aol.com (Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.)