RE: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.

["bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>]

Actually, for more and more people, film is one of the tracks they run
on, not THE track. And what you miss here is that we have not "inherited
a two track mode of photography." Rather, we are in a period of
transition in photography in which the main mode of image capture shifts
from film/chemical to electronic/digital, just as transitions from one
capture media to another occurred in earlier ages. Film will certainly
be around for a long time to come, but it will be less and less relevant
to a larger and larger percentage of photo hobbyists and pros. That
doesn't mean film isn't good, it just means that the end of an era is
upon us. ;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
Afterswift@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 12:21 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] squabbling over digitial vs. film.



In a message dated 8/5/03 8:17:09 AM, telyt@earthlink.net writes:

<< The endless squabbling over digital vs. film  seems pointless to me.
Each 
has its strengths and weaknesses; digital is 'good enough' for some
purposes. 
 For those who feel that settling for 'good enough' cheapens the craft, 
remember that 35mm doesn't provide the image quality of 4x5 or medium
format but is 
good enough for many purposes.  Good enough is just what it means: good 
enough.  It's all we need. >>

I think the upshot of all this is that we've inherited a two-track mode
of 
photography. We need to be competent in both. Since this is essentially
an M 
list, I would assume that film is the rail we essentially run on.

br 
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html