Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 04:00 PM 8/4/2003 -0400, Kyle Cassidy wrote: >...>The major problem is the slower process time. > >That, and the expense of film. Well, I suppose that can go the other way >too, if you're shooting six rolls a month, buying a film camera might be >practical. I shoot on average about 3 rolls a month, so while the there is film expense, it's not outrageous. I looked at other people who are using digital, and there is definitely a feel of overwhelmingly quantity over quality. Nothing wrong w/ that, but I personally prefer to think more about the pictures before shooting... > >What I would like to have is a simple camera, with low shutter lag, and a > >kick-ass lens. Yea, a digital M :-) Yes yes, I know a digital M is not > >If there was a digital M, I would be so there in the front of the line >poking Irwin with a fireplace poker to try and get him out of the way..... While I may be a small person, I know Karate and 7 other Japanese words :-) So get in line! :-) // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html