Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/08/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]With all the talk about digital cameras, scanners and printers, I feel the LUG is a good place to ask this question: Advice please. Here is the problem: I am a doctor in my mid 40’s, a family man, well off, and interested in photography for many years. I have always used slide film to document my family and holidays, and have a useful array of N---- equipment (manual bodies in good working order), BUT, I have been lured by the excitement and advertising surrounding digital cameras, the internet and broad band access, and am wanting to fall in to line with the way of consumerism. I would like a total solution, which will allow me to incorporate my old images, and I’m happy to spend a reasonable amount of cash. I have been down to shops and surfed the internet. I’ve been offered film scanners, flat bed scanners, digital cameras both p & s and high end (and not very much as a trade in ;-) ) I have begun the process by aquiring a modern computer and installing broadband internet access. Where should I go with digital equipment? My answer was in two parts, one cheaper than the other, and dependent on his desire to use digital cameras. 1. If you want to go digital, and want to have a set up which will rival your current analog system (in terms of being able to have display prints), you will need to have an slr digital camera with a minimum of 6 megapixels. You will probably want to have a smaller compact p & S but I would not consider anything less than 2 megapixel and would think 3 or 4 would be smarter. Iff you do not want to print from your digitized slides, you will probably be happy with a top range flat bed reflective/transmissive epson scanner such as the 3200, but if you want to print from the slides, you will have to go to the expense of a film scanner. Nikon make the 4000 and there is a slide feeder, Minolta’s is reported to be almost as good, but I don’t know if they have a feeder. To print, you have two options, make files and take them down to the processor for printing – my option, or and ink jet printer at home: the later is slow, the consumables are expensive, and they become expensive if you want prints bigger than A4 size. For snap shots, I find it hard to believe that anyone would use an ink jet solution, and remember, you are busy and do not have much spare time. 2. Keep your film based system, but instead of having prints made, go to a Fuji based shop, where they scan the negatives before printing anyway. These files are quite good enough for a 10 x 8 print, will allow you to catelog your images, and save you a fortune in high end digital cameras. Continue using slides on your trips and put the money you save into a top film scanner with slide feeder attachment to catch up on your previous trips. Get a good 4 to 5 megapixel point and shoot compact digital camera, use the lab to print digital files, and try it out for 12 to 24 months: if you become a digital sort of guy, you can now invest in the digital SLR, which will eventually save you money on film anyway. I'll be there in 2 years, waiting for my digital back to the R8 ;-) Comments? Alastair - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html