Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] arggghhh... rant at Keeble & Shucat...
From: "A. Lal" <alal@duke.poly.edu>
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 14:11:09 -0400
References: <156A2F34-C31F-11D7-9B40-003065BAFBD0@jphotog.com>

No.

As I stated in an earlier post, the RFDR's base remains constant, while that of the SLR depends on the aperture (NOT relative
aperture or f number) of the lens.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Welch" <eric@jphotog.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 02:20
Subject: Re: [Leica] arggghhh... rant at Keeble & Shucat...


> Nope. It's a change in both.
>
> Man, people need to do their homework on this topic! (If it were
> important, but it isn't, so forget it.)
>
> On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 01:47  PM, Mike Quinn wrote:
>
> > And... the example comparing the SLR and rangefinder is due to a
> > change in
> > accuracy in the SLR with focal length, not the rangefinder.
>
> Eric Welch
> Carlsbad, CA
> http://www.jphotog.com
>
> Lettin' the cat outta the bag is a whole lot easier'n puttin' it back.
> - Will Rogers
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] arggghhh... rant at Keeble & Shucat...)