Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/31
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Akhil - I;ve had both and the 2nd variety in my humble opinion is the only to get - it's smaller, has depth of field markings, and I thought it did a better job of securing the correct framelines. ernie On Thursday, July 31, 2003, at 11:19 AM, A. Lal wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Just wondering if anyone has handled both versions of the Tri- Elmar? > Is there a noticeable difference in mechanical quality between > the two? > > I recall trying out several samples the type II some years ago and > about half did not correctly trigger the framelines. For a > variety of reasons I did not buy one at the time, but am thinking of > getting one now. > > Comments are greatly appreciated. > > Regards, > Akhil > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html