Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Marc Small's statement that M6 is best built M camera
From: Ken Wilcox <klw.51@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 20:13:24 -0400
References: <CA16508C-C089-11D7-9F7D-003065F2FE36@xsmail.com>

This is the opinion of Marc and I suppose, a few others. I have an M2 
and M3 an M4 and an M6. The M6 has cost me much more in 
repair/adjustment than the others put together. My M4 has only need 
service one time-when I dropped it about 5 feet to a cement floor.

Ken Wilcox

At 6:26 AM +0700 7/28/03, Mitch Alland wrote:
>
>What are these complex reasons for which the M6 is a better-built 
>camera than earlier models? Usually people seem to feel that the M6 
>is not built as well as the earlier models, particularly the M3.
>
>--Mitch/Bangkok
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- -- 
__________________________________________________________________________________
Ken Wilcox 
Recue a Greyound! Call 1.800.GO HOUND
klw.51 at comcast.net                                           or 
visit www.rescuegrayhounds.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Mitch Alland <malland@xsmail.com> ([Leica] Marc Small's statement that M6 is best built M camera)