Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 18:33:28 -0700
References: <5609812.1058896903548.JavaMail.nobody@rowlf.psp.pas.earthlink.net> <5.2.1.1.2.20030722164231.0ac7deb8@192.168.100.11>

At 4:43 PM -0700 7/22/03, Richard F. Man wrote:
>At 12:09 PM 7/22/2003 -0700, Ted Grant wrote:
>>Hi,
>>I recently acquired the C/V 35 f1.2 and it's a beauty. Cuts exposures into
>>film like a razor blade with good contrast. Great for available light
>>shooting or any other kind.
>>...
>
>Ted, does it really give you 1.2? Dante conjectures that due to the 
>high number of internal surfaces, the light transmission may be less 
>than it claims? Also, how does it compare to the Summilux ASPH? (at 
>1.4 and above :-) )
>
>// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
><http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>

Two weeks ago or so I wrote about a comparison I did. Let me know if 
you want me to send it to you.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from mak@teleport.com (Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses)
Message from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> (Re: Re: [Leica] Voightlander lenses)