Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/07/20
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2003 21:25:20 -0700
References: <BB408243.2A75E%mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> <3F1B565D.8020905@ldp.com> <3F1B5AA5.D772DAA2@sympatico.ca> <3F1B60DD.2060701@ldp.com>
Rolfe Tessem said:
> I'm sure he had a Nikon, but the perspective of that picture is (at
> least to my eye) consistent with the use of a 35mm lens. Lots of guys
> used a Leica for the 35mm and 50mm and a Nikon for the 105mm and 200mm.<<
yep it was like that around there in 1968. :-)
ted
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to:
Message from Mike Quinn <mlquinn.mail@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from frank theriault <knarf.theriault@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Nick Ut's Napalm girl)