Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Watches stripped bare
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 21:59:58 -0600
References: <20030720030133.36739.qmail@web14408.mail.yahoo.com>

Jeff S wrote in part:

>Good thing you didn't cite Rolex workmanship!
>
Good guess why I didn't!!

GJL

>
>
>
>>Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2003 21:53:10 -0600
>>From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
>>Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica of watches
>>
>>I would say Rolex is the true Leica of wristwatches
>>
>>from a hold it's value over time standpoint. [stuff deleted]
>
>__________________________________
>Do you Yahoo!?
>SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
>http://sbc.yahoo.com
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Watches stripped bare)
In reply to: Message from Jeff S <four_season_photo@yahoo.com> ([Leica] OT: Watches stripped bare)