RE: [Leica] Leica vs. Digital: Our divided loyalties

["bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>]

Keep trying and you'll get it...;-)

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Saganich,
Christopher/Medical Physics
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 6:31 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica vs. Digital: Our divided loyalties


Well I've been trying to get my digital camera to do this.

http://www.saganich.com/street pages/bs102.htm

Chris Saganich

- -----Original Message-----
From: firkin@ncable.net.au [mailto:firkin@ncable.net.au] 
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 5:06 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica vs. Digital: Our divided loyalties

This is true, but although I do put the M on a tripod (see images of 
Antelope canyon etc recently), I often think why am I using the M on a 
tripod, not the blad or Rollei with its bigger negative. Time usually.

Cheers
On Thursday, Jul 17, 2003, at 04:11 Australia/Melbourne, bdcolen wrote:

> Adam brilliantly opined...
> ---
> I think most of use seldom use more than what digital gives us. Do you

> put your M on a tripod to shoot or only shoot at 1/1000th? If you 
> don't are you REALLY getting the full benefit of that Leica glass? I 
> don't think we do, I think we slip into the domain of digital imaging 
> simply by hand holding and shooting at slower shutter speeds, so we 
> never capture what we might otherwise achieve.
>
> Adam
> --
>
> Allow me to be blunt, and a wee bit rude - I rarely, if ever - see 
> images posted here - and I of course include my own in this comment - 
> that could not easily have been created with virtually any other brand

> of interchangeable lens camera. For that matter, most of the iconic 
> which have, over the decades, been shot with Leicas could just as 
> easily be shot with any other brand of camera. As Adam notes, it is 
> the rare photographer indeed who uses the 
> equipment/film/processing/printing
> combination necessary to eek out that Leica extra.
>
> That doesn't mean that people should toss their Leicas and grab
> digitals
> - obviously there is more to the camera/photographer combination than
> image resolving power. There are many things about Ms which may
> contribute to the production of great images.
>
> But Adam is smack on target when he says that most Leica produced
> images
> could easily be duplicated with good digital equipment because most
> Leica produced images do not begin to require the most out of Leica
> equipment.
>
> B. D.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
Alastair

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html



 
 
=====================================================================
     
     Please note that this e-mail and any files transmitted with it may
be 
     privileged, confidential, and protected from disclosure under 
     applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended 
     recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this 
     message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any

     reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this

     communication or any of its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If

     you have received this communication in error, please notify the 
     sender immediately by replying to this message and deleting this 
     message, any attachments, and all copies and backups from your 
     computer.


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html