Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Kip Peterson PAW Week 27
From: "GeeBee" <graham@geebeespaw.freeserve.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:21:15 +0100
References: <09D2B960-B363-11D7-A7D1-00039347633A@mac.com>

Kip,

Nothing is ever 'undisputed' on the LUG, least of all the assertion in your
reply. Even I would dispute it.

I hope this doesn't spark another on-line discussion about the merits or
otherwise of what I post. I know there are those out there that like it and
equally others who don't. At the end of the last such discussion, me being a
sensitive soul, I could only remember the posts that said it was (I am
paraphrasing here) crap :-)

- --Graham


From: <kip@mac.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: 11 July 2003 06:46
Subject: [Leica] Re: Kip Peterson PAW Week 27


> Graham:
>
> > http://homepage.mac.com/kip/PAW_2003
> > Kip,
> >
> > I love this shot. The sort of image that would make me unload the film
> > early
> > and develop to see if I had got it.
> >
> > - --Graham
>
> Coming from the undisputed "rock star" of the LUG, I am extremely
> flattered. Like most images with impact, I was just lucky with the
> light.
>
> Thanks so much--
>
> Kip Peterson
> San Diego
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from kip@mac.com ([Leica] Re: Kip Peterson PAW Week 27)