Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]At 07:41 PM 7/9/2003 +0100, Steve Unsworth wrote: >Or even... >http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/v24/msg09020.html >http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/v24/msg03100.html > >'I'd love to have an Olympus OM 1 but don't care to hear them discussed >in much detail here on the LUG. That's not why I'm here on the LUG the >Leica Users Group I'm here to hear about using Leicas.' > >All I can say Mark is that the Nikon must have made a hell of an impression >on you. >... Or that it is time to move on.... As *I* am being referenced in the 2nd link above, I forgot Mark's ribbing on me when I first joined. I do remember defending GeeBee's rights to post non-Leica pics because simply that GeeBee's pics are very good, regardless whether it is a Leica, Panasonic LeikaLeica , or the OM-1. I do find it highly amusing that Mark posted a love-fest of his new digital toy. I am even more amused that people are throwing stones back at him. Live by the swords, die by the swords. Perhaps you guys enjoy verbal banters, but I cringe at "no OT" criticism. When an OT thread gets too long, it will die. Live and let live. I am on both the OM and this list. Both lists generate LOTS of email. Even if 1/10th or 1/5th is off topic, what remains is still a lot of msgs, so OT is just noise. OK, time to stop rambling on and on... :-) // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html