Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Nathan, I don't think that I managed to say quite what I meant. I know that film will be around, and I know that I'll continue to use it, but it is perfectly clear that digital has significant advantages over film, and I can see how *I* might benefit from these advantages; the shop in Williamsburg where I have my film developed--a first rate lab--closed recently. At present, I'm not sure what I'm going to do--the alternatives are so bad that I won't risk my negatives with them. I know that I can process the stuff myself, but that's never been especially my thing (and I've never attempted the C-22 chemistry). I confront now having to send film off to mail order labs, which I see as something of a pain. And, like you, my present collection of gear represents three decades of buying, selling, trading, what have you. All of it is "well loved," so to speak, and, like you, I have never considered it an "investment" in any sense; I own it because it helps me to capture the images that move me. Still, I can see now that the hybrid film/digital workflow is a kludge in many respects, and it is, and has been, fascinating to see over the past several years how digital has infiltrated and finally captured significant elements of the LUG. I intended my comment about Tina and the "death knell" of professionals talking about the M to be tongue-in-cheek, but when one reflects that for as long as I've been on this list, Tina has been a sort of "goddess" of the Leica (I mean this in good humor and without irony) then it strikes me as a noteworthy moment that she's announced her, dare I say it, defection; or perhaps I can put it another way. If the LUG once worshiped a pantheon, we are moving quite rapidly toward monotheism. Chandos - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Nathan Wajsman (private) Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 1:35 AM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: [Leica] Slide mounts/scanner feeders/workflow Why, Chandos? So long as you can buy film, which is for a very long time, you do not have to care about what Tina or Ted or any other pro uses. That is the beauty of being an amateur--nobody is going to force you to go digital--it is purely your decision, not driven by deadlines, the need to email the picture to the editor 5 minutes after it was taken etc. I too have a substantial amount invested in Leica, but I do not care in the slightest what happens to its value. I mostly sell stuff when I want to buy some other similar stuff, so as long as the prices go down more or less uniformly on all Leica M gear, I will be fine. The return I expect from my Leica investment is measured in images produced and the pleasure I derive from it, not money. Nathan - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html