Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]John Straus wrote: > > That's a good backup choice but as your main film why shoot 800? > Anywhere bright or outdoors it will kill you as you'll need to be at > like f/16 for everything. Remember shallow DoF makes your photos look > "professional" compared to the everything in focus P&S photos others > will take. You have 2 cameras load 2 film speeds make 400 other. > > JS > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Don Dory > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2003 9:22 AM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Wedding Photography Questions > > Ken, > I think you will find the Kodak Portra 800 or the Fuji NPZ films to be > the ticket. Fast enough to not use the flash until the sun sets and > then enough speed to make even a smallish flash useable. Also sharp and > grain free enough to go to 16X20 if you do your job right. Which one to > use depends on you palette preference as well as how you local lab is > balanced. Shoot a roll of each in similar conditions, give them to > whichever lab you plan to use and make up your own mind. > > Don > dorysrus@mindspring.com > I also like faster films to make flash an option rather than a necessity most of the time. I use a Norman 200C and I've mainly shot 400 speed films. Or 320. Nowadays I'd move to the 800 stuff which has as i understand it, the Norm. When i used to use my 45mm GN Nikkor lens to shoot events and weddings I'd do an awful lot of shooting 2.5 or 3 feet away at f32 my flash set at half power! People way off in the distance if they were not way under exposed were sharp as hell. Sharp enough for 8x10's at least. These guys keep saying you cant get sharpness all the way down. Not my experience! For Events i switched to Hasselblad a main reason was i didn't want to subject my negs to "proofing." And subject myself to the 3 hours of work numbering the backs of the proofs to match the negs. So I started loaning my event wedding clients contact sheets like i would any other client. I started treating wedding clients like regular clients in all ways. No shlocky borderless machine prints I'd never have for any other jobs and no small snapshots. The 6x6 ones where a lot easier to deal with than the 24x36 format. At one point i was blowing up my contacts to 16x20 with an 8x10 enlarger. They were no longer contacts then. Projection proofs we called them at the rental lab. I've always tried to get as much as possible in focus and properly exposed. To have their favorite grandfather sitting in a chair in a great bokeh blur that you could just maybe make him out in would not make anybody happy. A lot of information in a wedding or event neg that you don't realize at first but they sure do. They want to see him and so do I. F16 and be there! Get a powerful strobe system with a powerful battery system to run it and blast away till the cows come home. If you've got some real light get dangerous and turn the strobe off. Isolated subject shooting is not for many shots in a wedding in my opinion. You just don't want to miss your focus and miss your shot. Buying all the relatives a new set of airplanes tickets can get expensive. And if I do have a back with some color in it you can believe me it's the exact same ASA as the black and white stuff I'm mainly shooting. It's just an accident waiting to happen if you juggle ASA's and you wont have long to wait. Constantly think of ways to make your whole operation simper so you don't have to think. Most people when the crunch is on, can't. In a wedding there is bound to be at least one crunch. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html