Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/10
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: 10 June 2003 09:04 Subject: Re: [Leica] Butterfly boots > At 08:12 AM 6/10/2003 +0100, GeeBee wrote: > >I think that the butterfly is a 'Peacock'. There is sure to be a > >lepidopterist out there somewhere who can correct me if I am wrong. The > >butterfly was there and not bought to the scene with PhotoShop. > > > >http://www.geebeephoto.com/html/digi02.html > >... > > Am I the only one who think the digital GeeBee sky look plasticky? I like > the analog ones better.... > > Nice legs :-) > > > // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> > <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> ================================================================= Richard, I would agree that the digital skies are not as good. Paradoxically I am rather pleased about that. If the relatively inexpensive digital camera that I am using was giving the same results as the "arm and a leg" price bracket of Lieca I would have to consider unloading them in what would be something of a market crash. Thanks for the "nice legs"compliment but as I am getting on in years I find sitting about in wet grass to be problematic so I carry those two false legs to use as props. They are of course made of plastic :-) - --Graham - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html