Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] lens radioactivity question
From: "giancarlo" <lindaboz@tin.it>
Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:15:13 +0200
References: <005001c32af0$aaaabe20$0316fea9@ccasony01> <010801c32af5$7f221500$d91bc8ac@aoldsl.net> <003801c32b22$0a89eec0$9cad5018@gv.shawcable.net> <005c01c32b57$c13c75e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <007501c32b63$51ce5820$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8>
 
hello,
as far as I know the very first 50 Summicrons M (summitar*) had in its
components rare earths sligthly radioactive.
Giancarlo

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 3:06 PM
Subject: [Leica] lens radioactivity question


> Some reading on Kodak aero ektar lenses i did because i bought one at an
> auction turned up the suprising fact that the lenses are radioactive.
> In several articles i found later on the subject it was mentioned that the
> radioactivity is not as bad with the ektars as with some Leica lenses.
> Do any of you know which Leica lenses are hot and where to get info on
them?
> Thanks
> simon jessurun
> amsterdam
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Leica Bargin)
Message from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica Bargin BAH!)
Message from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Leica Bargin BAH!)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] Leica Bargin BAH!)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] lens radioactivity question)