Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] No used 75 Summilux?
From: "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 20:43:16 -0400

You probably are not seeing it used because it is a fabulous, but -
compared to, say, the 35 Summicron - a relatively 'rare' lens, which
means that when people buy them, they tend to fall in love with them and
keep them. Although I did have one and sell it - incredible piece of
glass; weird focal length. ;-)

B. D.

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Richard F.
Man
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:23 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] No used 75 Summilux?


I have been on this list for 3, 4 months now (I know, I am a baby in 
Leica-world), but I don't recall seeing a FS on the 75 Summilux anytime,

either here or on the photo.net Leica forum. Certainly not used, and
even 
the usual postings from Mel/PhotoVillage/DC/etc. usually don't list it
in 
new condition. Is there any particular reasons why? Not popular due to
its 
focal length / size / cost? I know if I have money to spend I can get it

new from several places, so just wondering.

// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com> 
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Richard F. Man" <richard@imagecraft.com> (Re: [Leica] No used 75 Summilux?)
Reply from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@cox.net> (Re: [Leica] No used 75 Summilux?)
Reply from Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] No used 75 Summilux?)