Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/29
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <title></title> </head> <body> <font size="2"><font face="Arial,sans-serif">I must confess that I have always found 400CN to be very tolerant and I have a feeling hat Portra is probably more so although I have only shot a few rolls of it. It just makes life so simple to switch to C41 b&w. You can scan it with no trouble, get it processed anywhere etc. etc. I first used it on a trip to the US when I was worried about x-rays on film (and don't lets get started on that!) and haven't changed since.<br> <br> Gerry<br> </font></font><br> Jeffery Smith wrote:<br> <br> > Let me just barge in here <g>. XP2 is susceptible to blown highlights <br> > when<br> > shot at 400. If you rate it lower, it blows them out even worse. If <br> > you rate<br> > it higher, it looks grainier. T400CN seems to be less likely to do this.<br> ><br> > Jeffery<br> <br> </body> </html> - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html