Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Vignetting of Summicron M 2/28mm ASPH
From: Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com>
Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 10:13:14 -0700
References: <03E63C98-8802-11D7-A816-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <001101c31c26$03b78680$0100a8c0@liyue> <00ad01c31c38$3968ed70$70a72350@home> <003101c31c6e$37cd7d60$6401a8c0@oemcomputer>

At 8:17 AM -0400 5/17/03, Don Dory wrote:
>Rafael,
>I wouldn't condemn all 28 Summicrons based on the sample  provided.  I
>suspect this one is flawed and needs to be returned.  For example, last week
>one of the group complained that his/her 24 ASPH flared like crazy: yet I
>can not make mine flare, even when shooting diagonally into the sun.
>
>My personal belief is that the Leitz designs are very build sensitive.  So
>if an element is a little out of place then really bad things happen.  That
>might be why all aspheric lenses go back to Solms for repair.
>
>I can say that many on this list treasure the performance of their 28.
>
>Don
>dorysrus@mindspirng.com

Flare can be a QC issue. Vignetting, due both to optical design and 
physical construction is a design issue that is at the very heart of 
lens construction and will not vary from sample to sample.

See also my previous post on this topic.

- -- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: [Leica] Vignetting of Summicron M 2/28mm ASPH)
Message from "Y. Li" <liyue@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Vignetting of Summicron M 2/28mm ASPH)
Message from "Rafael Alday" <rafaelalday@yahoo.es> (Re: [Leica] Vignetting of Summicron M 2/28mm ASPH)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Vignetting of Summicron M 2/28mm ASPH)