Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]seems Tom that the second version is softer and...out of focus...Steve - ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel Ridings" <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no> To: "LUG (E-mail)" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Sent: Friday, May 16, 2003 8:28 AM Subject: Re: [Leica] Reworked sleepy anesthetist image > Sorry Tom, I do not like the second version. I'm a little tired after > working all day and my eyes give me trouble anyway. The new version > exaggerates it. > > I'd go for the first version. > > Daniel > > > On Fri, 16 May 2003, Tom Smart wrote: > > > A couple of weeks ago I got some feedback on an image that I scanned from a > > work print. I've been reworking it and came to something more like I had in > > mind. I'd be interested in your feedback about the final version. > > > > Old version: > > http://www.sleepytom.com/paw/PAW2.asp?i=100355 > > > > New version: > > http://www.sleepytom.com/paw/PAW2.asp?i=100362 > > > > > > Taken with an M4-2 and 50mm Summicron on HP5+ > > > > Index: > > http://www.sleepytom.com/paw/index.asp > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom "feel free to criticize, I'm flame retardant" Smart > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html