Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm
From: "Paul" <ubet@telia.com>
Date: Sun, 11 May 2003 01:56:34 +0200
References: <D3E05DB5-82F9-11D7-B712-00039314AF52@earthlink.net> <004e01c3173a$3da1c5e0$7d38030a@sroffice> <3EBD8902.CDB1EFB3@transbay.net>

Hi,

I remember when the Luckies cost 4,68 (converted from Swedish to American money). 
I quit smoking 3 months ago.

Why am I telling you this? I don't know. Please, forgive me.

/ Paul


- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "tripspud" <tripspud@transbay.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, May 11, 2003 1:19 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm


> Hi Seth,
> 
>       Well, I remember by '65 the Luckys were $0.23.  I've left the butts
> over 12 years ago.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Rich Lahrson
> Berkeley, California
> tripspud@transbay.net
> 
> Seth Rosner wrote:
> 
> > The nut's back with a bit of info that might be of interest: the January 1,
> > 1965 Leica (N.Y.) retail price list shows a list price for the 50/1,4
> > Summilux of $210., in black $243. A new M3 body was $306., in black $345. A
> > new M2 with self-timer, $264. And one was usually offered a fake trade-in
> > that amounted to a 10% discount from list.
> >
> > Of course, only 3 1/2 years earlier I bought a new Porsche Super 90 coupe at
> > the factory for US $3,300. A package of Lucky Strike cigarettes cost $0.18.
> >
> > Good weekend, all.
> >
> > Seth
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Will von Dauster <vondauster@earthlink.net> ([Leica] Summilux-M 50mm)
Message from "Seth Rosner" <sethrosner@direcway.com> (Re: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm)
Message from tripspud <tripspud@transbay.net> (Re: [Leica] Summilux-M 50mm)