Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/05/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]B.D. You may be surprised to hear that I mostly agree with you, but, it will also surprise you when I say, being the hothead that I am, I am tired of people chiming in saying something like "....o'migod, the sky is falling, I better get me a digicam before I have a nervous breakdown..." I really do not care that many people are moving over to digicam. What I wish is that they would just stop announcing that film is dead, because it is not. Not everybody wants to go along with what seems to many to make sense -- yes most people drive cars with automatic transmissions, but then there are those people insist on a car with a nice 5-speed. Regards, sl > Hi, Steve - The fact that you and many other people world-wide will > stick with film for sometime to come doesn't negate the validity of > Lew's statement - "the future is clearly digital." > > Most working pros are going to be forced, by the demands of customers > and economics, to switch to digital - if they haven't been so forced > already. (Keep in mind, btw, that many pros replace their equipment on a > regular basis, so making the switch from film to digital simply means > replacing the current film camera with its digital counterpart.) > > As to the admittedly huge non-pro market, hobbyists of any kind often > want what they consider to be the "latest" and the "best" - and in photo > that is taken to mean digital. Very very very few hobbyists own Leicas - > hell, very, very, very few pros - comparatively - own Leicas. So it's > not a matter of throwing away Leicas; it's much more a matter of what > to get junior for his birthday, what to get to record family events, or > what to get to replace the low-end Pentax SLR or the Canon EOS Rebel. > And the answer to those questions will, in very little time, have > nothing to do with film. > > Oh, right - obsolescence. We are at the point now with digital where > people can buy in at a number of price points and be happy for quite a > few years to come with the results they get. Sure, digital will continue > to improve. But how many people will have to have the improvements? > Certainly not enough so that your concern about "digicams" becoming > obsolete every two years is relevant. > > Best, > > B. D. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve > LeHuray > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 1:42 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Darkroom > > >> Much as we may hate to admit it, the future is clearly digital. There >> are too many pluses. > >> -Lew >> > > ....I have no doubt that for many people that is true, but, is also true > that for many of us, we will continue to shoot film. Especially when you > consider that for many decades millions of film cameras have been sold > (somewhere I read that photography is the #1 hobby, worldwide) annualy. > it makes no sense to think that all those people are getting ready to > throw their Nikons, Hassleblads, Leicas or whatever in the dumpster so > they can shoot with digicams that become obsolete about every year. I > will be continueing to shoot film for many years with simple Leica Ms > because that simplicity to not having to think about various program > modes is liberating for me to be able to think about the picture and NOT > the mechanics of taking the picture. > > sl > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html