Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs 35/1.4 ASPH
From: "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:08:01 -0700
References: <5.1.1.6.0.20030430093033.00a09940@pop-server.twcny.rr.com>

Ernest,
From f2.0 on, I can't tell the difference between these two lenses.  The
Summilux 35 ASPH is my most used lens.  My wife shoots with a Summicron 35
ASPH and they look the same to me.  Hers is chrome, so the weight between
the two seems about the same, though I know the chrome cron is around 65g
lighter than the black lux.

They're both great lenses.  You can't go wrong with either one.  It's simply
a matter of whether you need the extra stop.

- --Jim

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2003 6:39 AM
Subject: [Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs 35/1.4 ASPH


> While we are on the topic of 35/1.2 vs 35/1.4 I would like to know from
> those on the list who have had/used 35/1.4 ASPH compared to the 35/2 ASPH
> 'cron what are their comments. I know it's silly to preseverate on which
hi
> quality, expensive 35 one uses but enquiring minds want to know.
>
> ernie
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> ([Leica] 35/2 ASPH vs 35/1.4 ASPH)