Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Tri-elmar flare
From: "Steve Unsworth" <mail@steveunsworth.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 09:47:38 +0200

Jerry

If I remember correctly Leica say that the lens hood is not needed for the
35mm and 50mm focal lengths as the front element is recessed enough not to
need one. At 28mm the front element is at its most forward and Leica do
provide a lens hood (at about ˆ120 or so). I bought the lens hood and it has
seemed to make a difference.

Steve

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jerry Lehrer
Sent: 23 April 2003 07:28
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-elmar flare


Al

To be really effective, a hood on that lens should be extensible to three
different lengths. Or use three different hoods :-)  A bit much, I would
think.

On zoom lenses we use the longest possible hood that would not vignette on
the shortest focal length.  Of course it is not the best possible hood for
the longest focal length.

Jerry


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Tri-elmar flare)