Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/13

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL
From: "Lew Schwartz" <lew@clsystems.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:13:25 -0400

So what's the difference between Kodachrome and Pro-Kodachrome 200?

- -Lew 

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of
Christopher Williams
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 7:37 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL


Kodak only makes a limited supply of Pro Kodachrome 200, so the prices
are
outrageous. Guess Nat Geo can afford it.

On the topic of Kodachrome, Digital ICE 2 will be able to scan
Kodachrome.
Jump up and get down! Jump! Jump!

Chris


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Lew Schwartz"
Subject: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL


> Just getting back into Kchromes again and I came across the
> price difference between Kodachrome 200's KL around $7.50/roll and PKL
> at $20.00/roll. What on earth makes a 35mm film worth $20.00 a roll?
>
> -Lew S



- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (RE: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: KL vs PKL)