Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]- --On Friday, April 11, 2003 11:55:09 AM +1000 Rob Heyman <rheyman@bigpond.net.au> wrote: > Rolfe, I have not found this to be the case with NPC, but I understand > that some scanners will not work as well with grain of a particular size. > It is akin to a moire pattern. For instance Fuji Reala on my scanner is > atrocious, with (apparent) grain larger than 800iso film. > > If you do a scan on the archive you will find a number of references to > this problem. Or are you saying that the actual size of the grain on the > film is larger than NPH? > > Rob > Rob, I'm saying that the grain on NPS is (illogically) larger than NPH, which I think is actually very fine grained for a 400 speed film. NPC is newer and I agree that it has very tight grain. I tend to use Reala if I need a slower speed film and it scans fine on my Nikon 4000 -- what kind of scanner do you use? Rolfe > Rolfe Tessem wrote:I think you'll find that NPS actually has larger grain > than NPH. I'm not > >> sure why this is, other than the fact that NPH is probably a newer film. >> Once I figured this out, I stopped using NPS altogether and now use NPH >> 90% of the time. The other 10% is NPZ, although I've been trying some >> Press 800 and it is also very good. >> >> Rolfe > - -- Rolfe Tessem Lucky Duck Productions, Inc. rolfe@ldp.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html