Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Mark - I hope I'm still in The Fellowship!
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:30:14 +0200
References: <BAB6FF8D.A1B2%caliguri@rcn.com>

Noctilux ,eye of Sauron?
simon
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Caliguri" <caliguri@rcn.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2003 4:12 PM
Subject: [Leica] Mark - I hope I'm still in The Fellowship!


>
> Mark!
>     Take it EASY! It was just a joke!! Guess you are not an 'over the top'
> Lord of the Rings fan as I am!! Your talking to a lens was funny, and
> sounded so "Gollum"-ish !!!
>     Maybe "My Precious" needs to be reserved to only a Noctilux user ....
> :-)
>
> Ed (In jest of course! Now the Lens Wraiths will be after me!)
>
> > Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 18:23:02 -0700
> > From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] MarK's 35 -"One lens to Rule them All"
> > Message-ID: <3E90D2F5.9CEAD05@rabinergroup.com>
> > References: <BAB63816.A187%caliguri@rcn.com>
> >
> > Edward Caliguri wrote:
> >>
> >> Mark-
> >> Do you also call it "your Precious" and talk using "We" when you use ?
> >>
> >> "We must keep us safe, my Precious, yes .... with a UV filter, Yesss?
Only a
> >> Leica UVa filter for Us my Precious! No, Not Tiffin, Nooo! Only Leica,
YESSS
> >> -  LEICA!!"
> >> :-)
> >> Ed
> >
> >
> > Ed Hi! I don't see any other "Mark's" on the list is the above "quote"
> > representing what I think or where I'm at?
> > Maybe a little bit mostly I'm going to defend myself and say you didn't
> > exactly hit the nail on the head (I'm the nail)
> > OK
> > I do have little issues that I'm behind or don't like as I do give the
> > whole photography thing a lot of thought.
> > I'm totally down on UV filters. I don't own one. If i was at the end of
> > a pier with salt spray i might use a yellow-green or any number of
> > filters on my lens which would both protect it and really do something
> > to the image other than screw it up.
> > If it was color I'd use a warming filter. That cuts thought a ton of UV
> > and that is needed.
> >
> > Yes you do remember correctly I'm not so fond of Tiffen as that
> > lamination thing with the gel inside sure does not sound good to me in
> > principle. Way too many added air to glass surfaces and I'm not sure if
> > air to gel surface means anything. I like simplicity. I don't like a gel
> > squeezed in between to sheets of glass. I like a sheet of glass colored
> > the appropriate color.
> > But I've got quite a few of them, i buy them in a pinch off those racks
> > when i need one NOW. Someday to be replaced by a B+W or even better an
> > esoteric  Heliopan filter I hope!.
> > Normally when I order a B+W filter from B&H (confusing i know) I order
> > it with the super multi coated anti scratch coating which costs me an
> > extra ten bucks and 2 weeks.
> > As the front elements of many molded Asph Leica lense come from Hoya and
> > Hoya has a new premium filter line it does not to me seem so
> > inappropriate to get a Hoya filter. At least its a solid sheet of glass!
> > And you'd two sheets of Hoya glass next to each other. They wont be so
> > lonely everybodys talking German in the camera bag!
> > All my Leica filters and I have several cost me 10 or 15 bucks each. I
> > get them at swap meets. Many say N.Y. Leica on them I doubt their
> > coatings are anything to bring home to mom about.
> >
> > I shoot with my Hasselblads far more then i shoot with my Leicas. I try
> > to contain myself on this on the LUG but it leaks out sometimes and
> > there are rumors.
> > When I get my Rolleiflex F CLA'd that will change.
> >
> > I just think it's not so obvious and kind of stupid to be getting all
> > involved with Leica discussions and looking at Leica pictures...
> > on the Nikon list.
> >
> > And visa versa.
> >
> > It's the Leica users group. I come here to talk Leica.
> > That said I'm new to Leica, only ten years. My body of work you can take
> > a peak at on my website goes back 38 years to 1965 I was 13 with my
> > first darkroom. So there are Voigtländer Vito BL shots which I got then
> > and even a few Instamatic 100 shots from a bit before. Then Nikon. And
> > Rolleiflex. Then Hasselblad.
> > I shoot sometimes with a pocket Rollei 35.
> > I have a nice Calumet Cambo 4x5 sheet film with a Fuji lens. My most
> > recent "project" was done with it. The Hallowween thing which is in my
> > website. The Fuji lens may have to go there is a ring of bubbles around
> > the perimeter so it would seem to be separating. Still takes better
> > pictures than my Hasselblads and Leicas combined.
> > I have an Olympus FT single frame camera which i use now and then.
> > Mostly "then." Astonishingly mediocre optics for such a small image
> > circle. Not as sharp as my Nikon optics with the bigger image circle.
> >
> > So I'm sorry Ed if you've gotten too used to me or i seem too dogmatic.
> > (woof) I get sick of myself sometimes too. I hope this post straightens
> > some stuff out for the Rabinerisly disenchanted.
> >
> > Mark Rabiner
> > Portland, Oregon USA
> > http://www.rabinergroup.com
> > - --
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Edward Caliguri <caliguri@rcn.com> ([Leica] Mark - I hope I'm still in The Fellowship!)