Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank You tell us of what you are not, but what you are is an apologist for an immoral act. jerry Frank Filippone wrote: > So there are 2 standards... one for word journalists, another for Photo > journalists. Who work for the same paper, submit work for the same article, > etc..... and a third for the advertisers, who do not have to obey any rules > of truth. > > Captured is hardly the issue... it is an issue of telling a story through > words or photogrpahs. That is what a paper does. What story do you want to > tell ( sell?) ? How best to convey that story? What tools are at your > disposal? Does the method of capture really make a difference? > > Certainly I am no expert ethicist, photojouornalist, nor journalist, nor do > I teach any of those in a profeesional role. I am a rather simple person > who distrusts most to all media just because of the issue of slanted > reporting. I believe in a single standard, including the advertisers. > Either you tell the whole truth, everywhere in your paper, or you do not. > > Yes, I am a LA Times subscriber. and yes, they are biased..... and yes > they do tell their slanted part of a story. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html