Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]But BD, the comment I made was that this is precisely what written word journalists do..... why 2 standards? Is it beacuse you are a photographer that the standards are different, and more robust for the photographer? Why is it not OK that the paper would publish a 1 side point of view on the War itself? Omission is OK but commission is a sin? I think the comments about the power of the paper to influence, is one that we all accept. They do this through selective reporting, and I believe is an editorial driven point of view. I think I accept that the photojournalist is entitled to the same standards, and thus my opinion that his work was acceptable as it did not in my opinion and in my memory, not change the .meaning of the point of time. BTW, I do believe that for breaking the rules of the LA Times, the guy should have been reprimanded. FIred? Maybe, if it so states in the rule book. Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net What is with you folks? Unacceptable to say 'submit only those photos that you exposed, and none of those that you composed?' - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html