Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Improvement isn't the point. It's an article of faith within the public's perception that is at stake here. Slobodan Dimitrov Frank Filippone wrote: > > While I agree with BD that to break the rules you work under ( LA Times ) > you should be fired, I would hope that the same would be true of the > writer-type journalists. In their case, they just "heard it wrong"...... > In the photographers' case, he is without ability to excuse himself. > > BTW, if you actually saw the images ( LA Times today, page A6) you would > notice that the actual changes made did not change the intent or message of > the photo. It improved the image. Now, if he had submitted the unaltered > image to the paper, and sold the changed image to someone else, he would > have his job and $$$ too, and maybe, a Pulitzer. > > Funny how breaking the wrong rules gets you in so much trouble. > > Frank Filippone > red735i@earthlink.net > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html