Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:17:13 -0800
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJIEDLEPAB.darkroom@ix.netcom.com>

Austin Franklin wrote:
> 
> Patrick,
> 
> > I did have a Canon 50 f/1.2 screw mount lens serviced
> > by Focal Point.  Apparently, VanStelten used a GREASE
> > with a high viscosity.  It migrated over a period of 9
> > months, and a total of TWO rolls of film using that
> > lens, no extreme temperatures either in use or
> > storage.  Because it wasn't oil, the grease caused the
> > blades to bind and rendered the lens unuseable. Even
> > under examination, because of the use of grease and
> > not oil, there was no shiny telltale sign. Your case
> > is totally different, but mine is an example of
> > improper repair technique, and probably improper
> > volume of lubricant.
> 
> This is an astounding story, Patrick.  John is the best known lense repair
> expert on the planet.  This is the very first, out of hundreds of people
> I've known use him, that I've heard a thing bad.
> 
> Did you call him and ask him about this?  If not, why not?  If so, what was
> the rest of the story?  I just can't imagine him doing as you suspect,
> "botching" a repair, or him not making it right for you if in fact he was at
> fault for some reason.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Austin
> 
He was reaching for the oil and the phone rang and his hand jerked and
he grabbed the grease instead?


Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.rabinergroup.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] 35 Summilux from KEH, should I complain?)