Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]I have both of these lenses and am happy with them... however my Takumar 17mm Fisheye seems sharper than my Minolta/Leica fisheye. - -- Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Randy Jensen wrote: <snip> > > Because of this the 28-70 is not received very well. However, I own one > (got an amazing deal on it) and I use it a lot. Because of its convenience > I will often get a shot with it that I blow up to 16x20 or so and the lens > looks GREAT. Even though it's a Sigma design, it's under Leica's quality > control, so maybe the design is great, but Sigma's quality control sucks. > > I know the 16 fisheye is a Minolta design, yet it rates as one of the best > in lens tests for 35mm fisheye lenses, far above the Minolta brand one. > > My $0.02 - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html