Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] CL
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 22:55:37 -0800
References: <200303151958.LAA23439@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <3.0.6.32.20030315180248.007c7100@POP6.sympatico.ca> <002b01c2eb4a$5d98d6c0$66d5d2d9@telia.com> <000001c2eb7c$a2468d80$0d6ef7a5@mindspring.com>

Paul

A Leica CL is my camera of choice for traveling.  I am
hardly ever without one.

Gary is not facetious, just erroneous

Jerry

And as far as cost goes, a perfect CL with everything is
cheaper than a M3 body with nothing.

Jerry

Gary Williams wrote:

> Subject: [Leica] CL
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just recently joined the list, I have followed the discussion about the
> M5.
> > Personally I use a M6, and very pleased with that, but thinking about
> > getting a second body, a not so expensive one to put in my bag when
> > travelling. The M5 is cheaper, but not lighter, so I am considering the
> > CL. I have a 35 and a 50 summicron. Is the CL a good choice?
> >
> > Paul
>
> At the risk of sounding facetious, I would suggest an M3.  Use the M6 with
> your wide angles and the M3 with your 50mm and 90mm (and 135 if you have
> one).  My 2 cents.
>
> Gary
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "Paul" <ubet@telia.com> (Re: [Leica] CL)
In reply to: Message from Dan C <leicaman@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Asph or Aspherical?)
Message from "Paul" <ubet@telia.com> ([Leica] CL)
Message from "Gary Williams" <nasmformyzombie@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] CL)