Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] CL
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 16:06:56 -0800
References: <BA98FF22.32531%mak@teleport.com>

Mark

Please explain this "R2".  Leica never made one, so how
could you buy one for the same price as a CL?

Maybe you mean a SL2, but that was never the same new
price as the CL in the time that they were contemporaneous.

Mark Kronquist wrote:

> I HAVE OWNED A NUMBER OF THEMAND FOUND THEM PLEASANT to use and reliable and
> easy to pack. that said I would buy a NEW R2 for the same money or less. My
> 2 cents thanks  Mark
> > Hi!
> >
> > Just recently joined the list, I have followed the discussion about the M5.
> > Personally I use a M6, and very pleased with that, but thinking about
> > getting a second body, a not so expensive one to put in my bag when
> > travelling. The M5 is cheaper, but not lighter, so I am considering the
> > CL. I have a 35 and a 50 summicron. Is the CL a good choice?
> >
> > Paul
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Mark Kronquist <mak@teleport.com> (Re: [Leica] CL)