Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Hindustan M3?
From: Jerry Lehrer <jerryleh@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 01:32:31 -0800
References: <200303150317.TAA02287@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <001d01c2eabb$a8c59460$99495142@BILL>

Bill

If the Indian nation can produce cameras of the same
quality as they do engineers and computer scientists, I
would suggest that Leica. Nikon and Canon should
just give up.

Jerry

Bill Lawlor wrote:

> The Hindustan Ambassadors roll (slowly) on. Also Mahindras, Tatas, etc.
>
> Even further OT, the largest car manufacturer in India is now Maruti,
> which builds Suzuki versions for India and export.
>
> I'm not sure any of these companies are able or willing to make retro
> Leica M3's under licence.
>
> ...................
>
> Henning, I've ridden in Ambassadors, etc. I think the Russian Fed cameras
> have already won the title of Worst Posible M3.
>
> Namaste,
> Bill Lawlor
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Bill Lawlor" <wvl@infinex.com> ([Leica] Re: Hindustan M3?)