Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/08
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Simon Not really. It was a superb lens and I used it a lot till I discovered the Nikon SLR and gave up the Visoflex with all its special lenses and adapters. It seemed that almost every lens needed a different adapter. Jerry Dennis Painter wrote: > Simon Ogilvie wrote: > > > Jerry wrote: > > >You must know that there never was a 65mm f2.5 Elmar. > > > > > >Mine and everyone else's was f3.5.. The chap evidently > > >had a misprint. > > > > Aargh! Sorry - that was a typo on my part and the lens > > is of course an f3.5 and unfortunately not a particular > > rarity. > > > > Simon. > > The 65mm f/3.5 Elmar is not that "common". Thing is it's unlikely many > people want one to use. > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html