Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Erwin Put's Essay on the MP
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:26:45 -0500

Dennis,

> To me the posting of a copyrighted, private email was a question
> of ethics,
> not whether someone was "bad".

NO ONE POSTED A PRIVATE EMAIL.  What was posted was a URL to a publicly
posted "article".  How that "article" got publicly posted on a web site is
another question.

> "Fascinating" seeing your posts on this as compared to your posts when you
> see another ethical question that you call "conflict of
> interest". It would
> seem our ethical beliefs differ but that is understandable.

You missed the point of the comment, obviously.

Austin

> bdcolen wrote:
>
> > Fascinating the entire thread about Erwin and the MP was devoted to how
> > and why what he wrote got posted to the LUG, and whether someone's doing
> > so made them a bad person - rather than to Mr. Puts' assessment of the
> > camera.

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html