Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Unlike all the other rewind cranks, it has a substantial top to it. This would be enough to compensate for the open side. It does not have to be very rigid. I never used the setscrew on my Wasserman rewind crank. I just held it on with a bit of silicone. John Collier On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 08:37 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote: > Oh, I saw the knurling on the inboard side of the device, but what > holds > the rewinder on if it is not a complete circle? It would be > structurally > unsound otherwise. > > I will try to understand any technical explanation, as I am an > aerospace > stress analyst, (though recently retired). > > John Collier wrote: > >> Take another look Jerry, it does not go all around the knob. There is >> nothing you have to fit between the knob and the top plate when it is >> retracted. >> >> http://www.photo.net/bboard/uploaded-file?bboard_upload_id=11662984 >> >> On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 07:49 PM, Jerry Lehrer wrote: >> >>> Then I assume that there is enough clearance to mount it on the >>> existing >>> knob. >>> I tried a few on my M2 and M3, but the accessory rewinder needed an >>> amount of filing, before it could fit 'tween the knob and the RF >>> housing. I >>> >>> was hoping for a device to substitute for the outer portion of the >>> present >>> knob. >>> >>> Back to the drawing board. (CATIA CAD terminal) - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html