Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]If you are refering to the 100mm macro APO, then its in a league by itself. The older F4 100mm macro pales in comparison. However, as versatile as the 100mm APO, its not a lens for the race track. Due to its internal floating design (focus down to macro as well as distant-landscaping), focusing is slow because the focusing range it covers is very wide. Having said that, I find its a "must have" R lens because the resulting picture image it can produce is almost magical. - --- WOC <woc2@earthlink.net> wrote: > OK, I realize this is a Leica question, on topic and > all that but I'll risk > it anyhow. But rest assured, it will not be an easy > straight forward > question. > > I have been a M person for quite some time and for > SLR use, I have been > quite happy with my Nikon stuff (busy dodging the > tomatoes being thrown my > way). Few weeks ago I got the urge to look into R > equipment based on what > seemed to be a reasonable price for a R4S offered on > for sale by one of our > members. This led to looking for lenses and is now > totally out of hand. A > friend dropped off a R9 with winder and 100 macro > lens for me to use for a > week and a half while he is out of town. > Unfortunately he did not bring the > flash so I am somewhat limited. He is convinced the > lens is one of the > magic lenses and I will be hooked once I see the > results. > > I find the R9 a bit bulky and heavy, but I'm sure > that has to do with using > a 'unfamiliar' body with controls that are similar > but different and using a > lens that I would not normally use for 'everyday' > stuff. I have the 105 > macro but it is one of the lesser used lenses on my > shelf. And yes, it is > AF, and yes, I tend to prefer AF. > > I guess the most pressing question is what film to > use that will best show > off the lens. I know that slides would probably be > better then print but I > would prefer to use print film. I loaded some Fuji > 400 in it to start and > have some Fuji 100. Is there something better I > could be using? I realize > that to some extent the answer tends to be somewhat > personal, but there are > films that are better then others. Guess I should > mention that I like the > 'rich' colors. Would like B&W but over the decades > have come to the > conclusion that it is a talent I do not have. But > then, maybe this is the > lens to teach me proper B&W... Is this really one of > the magic Leica lenses? > My favorite subjects are cars in motion on a race > track. Given the snow in > the North East it is unlikely I'll see that while I > have this though.... > > Sorry for the length. Awaiting the wisdom of the > group to lead me to the > next step, which could quite possibly be a shrink > :-> > > Thanks, > Bill > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html