Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2003/02/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Just played with am MP --- and BD and an order of Magnitude
From: Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:10:02 -0800
References: <200302251943.LAA09246@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <BA815B41.9369%caliguri@rcn.com> <20030226124047.GB10503@panix.com> <3E5CBFF7.9080102@ubi.edu> <3E5CD68D.2060603@ldp.com>
Rolfe Tessem wrote:
<snip>
>
> Yes, and in fact, other than the fact that the M6J was a .85 finder only
> and the different finish, what are the differences between the new MP
> and the M6J.
>
> Rolfe
I can't tell from the photos of the new M6 but I bet the top plate has one
obvious difference from the M6J. Not the rewind, not the window frames, not
the engraving, but how it fits around the lens mount.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Just played with am MP --- and BD and an order of Magnitude)
In reply to:
Message from Edward Caliguri <caliguri@rcn.com> ([Leica] Just played with am MP --- and BD and an order of Magnitude)
Message from Rei Shinozuka <shino@panix.com> (Re: [Leica] Just played with am MP --- and BD and an order of Magnitude)
Message from Lucien <director@ubi.edu> (Re: [Leica] Just played with am MP --- and BD and an order of Magnitude)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] Just played with am MP --- and BD and an order of Magnitude)